Destroying Mandela Effect theories

There are a lot of theories about what is causing the Mandela Effect out there. I want to logically explain why I believe a number of them are incorrect.


Let's start with UFOS. I have read 4200 ufo books so I cannot have a conversation on ufology with the average person. My brain, off the top will flat out tell you, you are wrong and then back it up with what books prove you wrong. The average person does not have the base knowledge to argue with me. I tell you that because I have spent thousands of hours studying the Mandela effect. I want to come at it from an intelligent, knowledgeable position. 


I write this blog on ufos but the Mandela Effect is changing our reality, and that is a more immediate concern. I keep studying it for that reason.


I also am laser focused on trying to find out what is going on, what caused it, is it reversible. I am most interested in the cause. 


You can give examples of Mandela Effects all day long but you will be no closer to solving the Mandela Effect. You studied it's changes, not focusing on what is causing the changes. It's good to document, the changes are data that is very important. Anybody that documents the changes is heroes in my book.


I am an authority on the Mandela effect because I have spent thousands of hours studying it.i am laser focused on the cause so let's look at common Mandela Effect theories.


We are shifting to higher frequencies.


The biggest problem I have with this theory is that it is centered on you. There are still 7.4 billion people out there. Even though some realities had 9.5 we still have mass murders, people in politics and not a higher class of being. It's the same, maybe a few less. According to this theory everything is better. Really, have you seen the Bible. It's a mess. Spelling has gone down hill on products to where you have to pronounce them differently. The answer to the Mandela Effect is not that we are shifting frequencies. If so, jail inmates should have vanished.


We are living in a holographic universe.


This one is probably the hardest to disprove. The biggest argument against it comes from reading thousands of online comments. If reality changed memories should still be the same, yet you have 7.4 billion people with different past memories. They came from somewhere. Another argument I could make against this theory involves people switching their memories back and forth. I guess I look at it from a perspective of this is one massive operation. If it's one being rewriting us, it's a monumental job. I watched Star Wars four times in one day from the same source and it was different every time. Imagine, rewriting 7.4 billion memories every 2 hours. That's just on this Planet. The Earth moved 80,000 light years so logically speaking the Mandela Effect should be hitting the entire Milky Way, or the entire Universe. How many aliens would have to be rewritten every two hours? Work fast, I don't buy that an army could do this.


Dimensions are collapsing.


I want you to keep in mind the two hour change. If dimensions are collapsing how do you explain the backwards knowledge level on the Mandela effect. Let me explain. In July of last year youtube had 500,000 videos with Mandela Effect in the title. More people were searching Google for Mandela Effect than new car. Now look at youtube over the last month. It's like thousands of new people just discovered the Mandela Effect. The percentage of people who know about the Mandela Effect went downwards. That's astonishing. If dimensions are collapsing that would not have happened.  A loss of knowledge argues against anything collapsing.


Finally, the two human theories as I call them. Cern and the dwave Computer. 


Cern


I argued it would take an army to accomplish what we are seeing with the Mandela Effect. Cern doesn't have an army. They are not firing up the collider every two hours to make everything change. 


In the history of the human race no human has had the capabilities we are seeing with the Mandela Effect.


Smashing particles together is not going to cause 7.4 billion people to have memories of different universes every 2 hours. If you read comments humans are being jumbled up or changed constantly. One human argued it's Sex in the City, then the next day argued It's Sex and the City. The sheer magnitude of the size of the Mandela Effect argues against any type of human cause.


Dwave


The changing of a single bit in a computer from a 1 to a 0 or the coexistence of those bits is not going to effect the changes seen in the Mandela Effect. Even if you used 7.4 billion bits, to visit that many universes you are still not demonstrating the capabilities shown with the Mandela Effect. Are they firing up the Dwave every two hours to rewrite the memory of 7.4 billion people? 


Cern and Dwave are not the answer to the Mandela Effect. Smashing particles or changing bits is not the answer when you look at the data presented in thousands of online comments by people on the Mandela effect.


Anybody who thinks Cern or Dwave is the answer has not done their research on the Mandela effect.


I have.