Tuesday, January 7, 2014
Best UFO book, you probably haven't read!
I have read "The Aztec Incident Recovery At Hart Canyon" and can honestly say it is one of the top researched UFO books of all time. The book is very well thought out and I love how the authors cover every aspect of the Aztec Crash. I stand up and applaud Scott and Suzanne Ramsey and all the others who helped research this book. I have read some very good UFO books lately, but this book is worth every penny. My advise to you is, buy this book. If you think the Aztec Incident was a hoax because of two con-men, well your 100% wrong. Imagine, two firsthand witnesses. This book will change your thinking completely about who was Cahned. I spelled that correctly, ie it was not Newton and GeBauer. My favorite lines are at the very bottom of page 207. The book redeems Frank Scully, and brings all the facts of an alien spaceship crash in Aztec in 1948 out in the open. Great Great Read!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
At Terry the Censor. Your "source" was in 8thcharge grade at the time. The crash happened on a thursday meaning your source was in school. You can believe someone who was not there. I believe Doug Noland and Ken Farley. Who were standing on the Mesa, looking at the alien ship.
ReplyDeleteDoug and Ken never met. They both described two police officers. Ken and Doug both said Doug was standing by the craft. Both claimed Ken was standing away from the craft on the west side of the mesa. Making it a true event. :)
ReplyDeleteTerry, I am a believer 100%. All skeptical comments get deleted. Its nothing personal. I deleted another skeptic as well. Its like, Ive read over 4000 books on ufos. I know for a fact the other skeptic had read twenty five ufo books. Its not worth my time intellectually. How many ufo books have you read Terry? Also, I deleted your comment because you resorted to name calling.
ReplyDeleteTerry, I am done replying to you. I will continue to delete your comments until you have something worthwhile to contribute.
ReplyDeleteMajestic leader, I now see the superior logic in your reasoning. You are right and everyone else is wrong. I am ashamed at my previous lack of understanding. I hope you can forgive me.
ReplyDeleteTerry, let me give you some of my thoughts on ufology. First off, forget ufology and think of any other event. Who are you going to believe? The person who was there and witnessed the event or the person who was not there. It is illogical to believe the person that was not there. Just as it is illogical to say, because I didn't see event x, event x never happened. If you think this way no event before your birth happened. Like I said, illogical. You can spend your entire life reading on Ufology from bad sources. You cannot learn ufology from people who have no knowledge of ufology. A witness can tell you the date of their encounter, the time of their encounter and what they saw. The source is firsthand and fact based. A skeptic is a secondhand source who gives their opinion on what the witness saw, but again, wasn't there and therefore its illogical to believe them. I like to study alien races. Not ufos. I could care less about the metal, I am interested in the beings inside the metal. I choose to read to gain as much knowledge as I can as quickly as I can. When I started the internet didn't exist. I chose to not specialize in ufology. Budd, abductions, and so on. I read everything. I mean everything on any aspect of ufos. I did this to stand on the backs of giants. In other words, I learned what every ufo researcher wrote. I studied the entire field. The reason is so I can answer the big questions. Why do aliens abduct people and mutilate cattle? In doing this I found multiple internal consistences in ufology but I want to mention two. The first is alien abductions. The Rwanda case where the school children had never heard of or seen a grey but all drew greys perfectly must mean, greys exist. The second is the Leland case from Ardy Clarke's book. When she was in Alaska a second source told her a story that matched Leland's story in every detail. Meaning Leland didn't lie or make it up. I know about the Alaska case. It was not in Ardy's book. Don't judge in the field of ufos. The internal consistences are why I am a ufo believer 100%.
ReplyDelete